People v. Barros
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
*1584Opinion
BRUINIERS, J.
Proposition 361 outlines “ ‘an alternative sentencing scheme’ ” for persons convicted of certain drug offenses and mandates probation in lieu of incarceration for most nonviolent drug offenders. (People v. Canty (2004) 32 Cal.4th 1266, 1275 [14 Cal.Rptr.3d 1, 90 P.3d 1168] (Canty); see Pen. Code, § 1210.1, subd. (a).)2 This mandate does not apply, however, to a “defendant who, in addition to one or more nonviolent drug possession offenses, has been convicted in the same proceeding of a misdemeanor not related to the use of drugs or any felony.” (§ 1210.1, subd. (b)(2)…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Delaney v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- People Ex Rel. Lockyer v. Shamrock Foods Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Kellett v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- People v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- People v. CantyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- De Vries v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- De Vries v. Regents of UCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- People v. Ruano CA6California Court of Appeal · 2016
- State v. Tapia MunozCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2026