Legal Opinion
Boykin v. State Highway Department
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided July 27, 1928No. 12490PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice StabeER.
This is an action in the original jurisdiction of the Court for a permanent injunction, to restrain the State Highway Department from constructing and hard-surfacing a section of road, about 5.4 miles in length, proposed by the department as a substitute for a part of the road on Route No. 26, between the Town of Rembert and the City of Camden, which the petitioners allege, the highway department is without authority of law to do.
In 1924 the Legislature passed an Act (33 Stat., 1193), known as the “Pay-As-You-Go” Act, the title of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Inhabitants of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1810
- Gaston v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
- Bennett v. WellesleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Heiple v. Clackamas CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1890
- State ex rel. Funke v. BurgesonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Holloway v. PurcellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Cohen v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Sloan v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
- Cooke v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
- Fant v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.