Sloan v. State Highway Department
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Stabeer.
By an Act of 1924 (33 Stat. at Barge, p. 1193), the Legislature created a state-wide connected system of hardsurface and other types of public roads, to be constructed and maintained by the State Highway Department. Of the roads designated by the Act to be hard surfaced in Greenville County is one “from end of pavement near Greenville southeasterly along Route No. 2 by way of Maul-din, Simpsonville to the Laurens County line near Fountain Inn.”
The petitioners, property owners or taxpayers residing on or along Route 2 have instituted…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gaston v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
- Boykin v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
- Powell v. Spartanburg CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
- Hargrove v. Sawyer, Highway CommissionerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
- Fairey v. Sawyer, Com'rSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
3Cited by6 opinions
- Davis v. AlexanderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Davis v. . AlexanderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Tomlin v. Town of Las CrucesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1934
- Cooke v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
- Fant v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.