Legal Opinion
Cohen v. City of Hartford
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 31, 1998No. SC 15754PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PALMER, J.
In 1990, the defendant, the city of Hartford (city), adopted a regulation pursuant to which a downtown street, Pratt Street, is closed to vehicular traffic from 11:30 a.m. to 2:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, from approximately May through October, so that the street may be used as a pedestrian mall during those times. The plaintiffs, Samuel Cohen and Daniel Cohen, are the owner and manager, respectively, of two office buildings located on Pratt Street. They claim that the regulation is invalid because it is contrary to a requirement in the deed conveying Pratt Street to the *208c…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Keystone Bituminous Coal Assn. v. DeBenedictisSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Yee v. City of EscondidoSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Webb's Fabulous Pharmacies, Inc. v. BeckwithSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Cumberland Farms, Inc. v. Town of GrotonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Citino v. Redevelopment AgencyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Town of Ridgefield v. Eppoliti Realty Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Tuchman v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Contractor's Supply of Waterbury, LLC v. Commissioner of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.