Legal Opinion

Fant v. State Highway Department

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 2, 1931No. 13263PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. CpiiEE Justice Beease.

This is an action by the plaintiffs for the purposes, as set forth in the “Statement” of their counsel, “to enjoin the State Highway Department from changing U. S. Route No. 29, a highway in the state highway system, by entering the City of Anderson on Sayre Street, which would destroy the identity of said highway, U. S. Route No. 29, and also to enjoin the State Highway Department from laying out, grading and paving a highway and- constructing an underpass, in the City of Anderson.”

The defendants, in their return, admit that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Martin v. SayeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
  2. Gaston v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  3. Boykin v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
  4. Sloan v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
  5. Hargrove v. Sawyer, Highway CommissionerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bland v. City Council of SumterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1943
  2. McDonald v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
  3. State Ex Rel. Edwards v. QuerySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API