Legal Opinion
Holloway v. Purcell
California Supreme Court
Decided April 25, 1950No. Sac. 6039PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.
Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment for defendants entered after a demurrer to their complaint was sustained without leave to amend.
This action was brought by plaintiffs as taxpayers to enjoin the proposed relocation of a section of Route 3, part of the state highway system extending from Sacramento to the Oregon state line via Yreka. (Sts. & Hy. Code, § 303.) The complaint alleged that defendants, the Director of the Department of Public Works and members of the California Highway Commission, intend to abandon the part of Route 3 that runs along Auburn Boulevard between the cities of Roseville…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Sunshine Anthracite Coal Co. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- National Broadcasting Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. Rock Royal Co-Operative, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Opp Cotton Mills, Inc. v. Administrator of the Wage & Hour Division of the Department of LaborSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Muskopf v. Corning Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Breidert v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
- In Re Redevelopment Plan for Bunker Hill v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Darnall v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
- Metropolitan Water Dist. v. MarquardtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.