Legal Opinion
IML Sea Transit, Ltd. v. United States
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 21, 1972No. Civ. C-70 2667PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before HAMLIN, Circuit Judge, and EAST and ZIRPOLI, District Judges. PER CURIAM.
Pursuant to an order of investigation dated January 17, 1969, the Interstate Commerce Commission (hereinafter “ICC”) commenced a proceeding against IML SeaTransit, Ltd. (hereinafter “SeaTransit”) to determine whether SeaTransit was operating as a freight forwarder in interstate commerce without a permit from the ICC in violation of Section 410(a) of the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C. § 1010(a). The ICC’s Examiner found that SeaTransit’s operations fell within the definition of a freight forwarder in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Thompson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. Federal Maritime Commission and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- Alaska Steamship Company, a Corporation v. Federal Maritime Commission and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- Freight Consolidators Cooperative, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1964
- IML Seatransit, Ltd. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1971
3Cited by7 opinions
- Paul R. Newhouse, Jr., Suki R. Kuresa and Elwin L. Adarna, Cross-Appellants v. Robert's Ilima Tours, Inc., Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Transway Corp. v. Hawaiian Express Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Valley Line Company v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
- Hawaiian Express Service, Inc., a Corporation v. Pacific Hawaiian Terminals, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Aloha Consolidators International v. United StatesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.