Valley Line Company v. United States
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCALERA, District Judge.
I
This is an action under the provisions of 28 U.S.C., sections 1336, 1398, 2284 and 2321-2325 and 5 U.S.C. sections 701-706, to set aside orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission (Commission) entered in its Finance Docket F26737, Katy Industries, Ine.-Control-Cenac Towing Co., Inc., 342 I.C.Cs 666. Those orders held that Cenac Towing Co., whose transporation operations are exempted from regulation by the Commission, is not a “carrier” within the meaning of section 5(13) of the Interstate Commerce Act and that, therefore, the Commission does not have…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fusari v. SteinbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- McLean Trucking Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Federal Maritime Commission v. Seatrain Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- IML Sea Transit, Ltd. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jack O. Black v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- New York v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- State of New York v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977