Legal Opinion

Valley Line Company v. United States

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 30, 1975No. Civ. A. 74-105PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SCALERA, District Judge.

I

This is an action under the provisions of 28 U.S.C., sections 1336, 1398, 2284 and 2321-2325 and 5 U.S.C. sections 701-706, to set aside orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission (Commission) entered in its Finance Docket F26737, Katy Industries, Ine.-Control-Cenac Towing Co., Inc., 342 I.C.Cs 666. Those orders held that Cenac Towing Co., whose transporation operations are exempted from regulation by the Commission, is not a “carrier” within the meaning of section 5(13) of the Interstate Commerce Act and that, therefore, the Commission does not have…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fusari v. SteinbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. McLean Trucking Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Federal Maritime Commission v. Seatrain Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. IML Sea Transit, Ltd. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jack O. Black v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
  2. New York v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  3. State of New York v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API