Alaska Steamship Company, a Corporation v. Federal Maritime Commission and United States of America
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MERRILL, Circuit Judge:
The Federal Maritime Commission has regulatory jurisdiction over interstate water carriage to and from the State of Alaska. Where such carriage is combined with carriage by motor transport, in through-route and joint-rate arrangements, jurisdiction over rates lies with the Interstate Commerce Commission. 1
Alaska Steamship Company is a common carrier by water, operating between Seattle, Washington, and various points in the State of Alaska and, until the events leading to these proceedings, has operated entirely under FMC regulation. In 1967 it entered into through-route…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Manufacturers Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Tap Line CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Thompson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- United States v. Capital Transit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Puerto Rico Maritime Shipping Authority and Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. Valley Freight Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. Federal Maritime Commission and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- IML Sea Transit, Ltd. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1972
- Norfolk and Western Ry. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1994
- Blennerhassett Historical Park Commission v. Public Service CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.