Legal Opinion

Hawaiian Express Service, Inc., a Corporation v. Pacific Hawaiian Terminals, Inc., a Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 20, 1974No. 72-1696PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALFRED T. GOODWIN, Circuit Judge:

Hawaiian Express Service, Inc., a freight forwarder authorized by the Interstate Commerce Commission to operate in the San Francisco-Hawaii trade, sued under 49 U.S.C. § 1017(b)(2) to enjoin Pacific Hawaiian Terminals, Inc., from offering transportation services which Hawaiian Express contends amount to “freight forwarding” under the Interstate Commerce Act § 402(a)(5), 49 U.S.C. § 1002(a)(5). The district court denied relief, and Hawaiian Express appeals.

With the exception of the degree of Pacific’s utilization of motor common carriers, most of the material…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Acme Fast Freight, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1940
  2. Acme Fast Freight, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. IML Sea Transit, Ltd. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1972

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Transway Corp. v. Hawaiian Express Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  2. Transway Corporation, a Hawaii Corporation, and Public Utilities Commission, State of Hawaii, Intervening-Plaintiff v. Hawaiian Express Service, Inc., a California Corporation, and Mid-Pacific Forwarding Company, Inc., Honolulu Freight Service and Ameri-Con Pacific Freight Systems, Intervening-Defendants. Transway Corporation, Public Utilities Commission, State of Hawaii, Intervenor-Plaintiff v. Hawaiian Express Service, Inc., Mid-Pacific Forwarding Co., Inc., Honolulu Freight Service, Inc., and Ameri-Con Pacific Freight Systems, Intervenor-Defendants, Hawaii Trucking Association, Amicus Curiae. Transway Corporation, a Hawaii Corporation, Public Utilities Commission, State of Hawaii, Intervening v. Hawaiian Express Service, Inc., and Mid-Pacific Forwarding Co., Inc., InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API