Legal Opinion
Paul R. Newhouse, Jr., Suki R. Kuresa and Elwin L. Adarna, Cross-Appellants v. Robert's Ilima Tours, Inc., Cross-Appellees
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 13, 1983No. 81-4569, 81-4580PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:
This case is before us for a second time. The plaintiffs are former drivers for Robert’s Ilima Tours, an Hawaiian corporation providing transportation services for tourists on the island of Oahu. Robert’s practice was to compensate its drivers for actual driving time only, not for time spent on-call waiting for assignments. In August 1975, plaintiffs brought an action to recover overtime compensation under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 206, 207, and 215 (1976), and under the Hawaii Wage and Hour Law, Hawaii Revised Statutes §§ 387-2 and 387-3…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Briggs v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Levinson v. Spector Motor ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Morris v. McCombSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- George E. Vanelli, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Reynolds School District No. 7, Defendants-Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Clyde A. Perkins v. Standard Oil Company of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Nachwalter v. ChristieCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- Paul S. Segal v. Gilbert Color Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- Barry Jay Feldman v. Gary L. HenmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Nachwalter v. ChristieCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- Bratt v. County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.