Legal Opinion

In re United Public Utilities Corp.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided December 11, 1943No. Civ. No. 347PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEAHY, District Judge.

This matter is here on an application of the Securities and Exchange Commission *976pursuant to Sections 11(e), 18(f) and 25 of the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 79k(e), 79r(f), 79y,1 to approve a certain plan of UPU as fair, equitable and appropriate to effectuate the provisions of Section 11(b) of the Act.

UPU is a registered holding company. It has $6,880,850 of Bonds outstanding collateralized by securities of its subsidiaries among which were Texas Ice and Refrigerating Company and Cap F. Bourland Ice Company. The Commission on March 4, 1942,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Dorrington v. ManningSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. American Crystal Sugar Co. v. NicholasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
  4. Security Trust Co. v. StappSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Gill v. Benjamin Franklin Realty & Holding Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Engineers Public Service Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
  2. In re United Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API