In re Engineers Public Service Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BIGGS, Circuit Judge.
The pertinent facts relating to these three appeals are clearly and succinctly set out in the opinion and findings of fact of the court below. See 71 F.Supp. 797. In addition thereto more complete descriptions of Engineers Public Service Company and its holding company system will be found in In the Matter of Engineers Public Service Co., 9 S.E.C. 764, 10 S.E.C. 904, and 12 S.E.C. 41 and 268. In view of these reports, no extended recapitulation of facts will be necessary.
The questions presented may be put as follows: (a) Did the Commission properly approve as “fair and…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Vanston Bondholders Protective Committee v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Consolidated Rock Products Co. v. Du BoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Group of Institutional Investors v. Chicago, M., St. P. & P.R. Co., and 9 Other CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Central-Illinois Securities Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- In re North American Light & Power Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1951
- Matter of Engineers Public Service Company. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Guggenheimer & Untermyer, Louis Boehm, and Raymond L. WiseCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
- In re Engineers Public Service Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1953
- Appeal of North American Light & Power Co. Appeal of North American Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.