Legal Opinion
Dorrington v. Manning
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided December 19, 1938No. Appeal, 51PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion bx
Baldrige, J.,
The plaintiffs are former employees of the Frank Martz Coach Company, Inc., who were refused admittance to the newly organized Division No. 1119 of the defendant association, composed entirely of employees of the Frank Martz Coach Company, Inc., (hereinafter called the Coach Company), White Transit Company, Inc., and Frank Martz Estate, Inc. They were later discharged by their employer in consequence of a strike called by defendants for the primary purpose of forcing the employer to dismiss the plaintiffs.
The bill in equity, brought against the defendant association and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Senn v. Tile Layers Protective UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Angle v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Lauf v. E. G. Shinner & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- New Negro Alliance v. Sanitary Grocery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Campbell v. . GatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Geary v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- James v. Marinship Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Wells v. ThomasDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
- Williams v. International Brotherhood of BoilermakersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Gordon v. TomeiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.