Legal Opinion
In re United Corp.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided January 31, 1949No. Civ. No. 1146PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEAHY, Chief Judge.
*198The United Corporation’s present plan under § 11 of the Public Utility Holding Company Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 79k, results in the retirement of all of its preference stock. The SEC approved the plan which provides for an exchange of each share of United’s preference stock for the following package of securities:
1 share of Public Service Electric and Gas Company Common Stock
1 share of The Columbia Gas System, Inc. Common Stock
%oths of a share of The Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company Common Stock. $6 in cash.1
The organization, cápitalization, assets, liabilities, the income from…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Otis & Co. v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- New York Trust Co. v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Commonwealth & Southern Corp. v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
- In Re Standard Gas & Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Matter of the United Corporation. Joseph B. Hyman, in No. 12151, Randolph Phillips, in Nos. 12157, 12158Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
- General Protective Committee for the Holders of Option Warrants of the United Corp. v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- In re United Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1954