Legal Opinion

Davies Motors, Inc. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 12, 1929No. 5889PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILBUR, Circuit Judge.

The intervener and appellant sold the Willys-Knight roadster automobile, respondent herein, to one Hans P. Mortensen by a conditional sales contract under which it retained ownership of the automobile. At the time the automobile was seized by a government prohibition agent, September 27, 1928, the balance due on the purchase .price was $896. The district attorney filed a libel under section 3450, Rev. St. (26 USCA § 1181), alleging that at the time the automobile was seized it contained 12 pint bottles of intoxicating liquor, which had been concealed therein with the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. One Ford Coupe AutomobileSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Confiscation CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  3. Port Gardner Investment Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Commercial Credit Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  5. United States v. General Motors-Acceptance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. SoderbergDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1931
  2. United States v. One Buick AutomobileDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1930
  3. United States v. One Reo Coupé AutomobileDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1931
  4. United States v. One Whippet Sedan AutomobileCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1930
  5. Commercial Credit Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API