Legal Opinion
Estate of Hensel
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 13, 1956No. Civ. 21797PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VALLÉE, J.
Appeal from an order settling the first accounts current of trustees and denying an amended petition of one trustee to surcharge another.
The decree of distribution in this estate, dated January 12, 1949, pursuant to a trust created by the will, distributed half of the estate to Ruth Leihy Kertz and Otto Hensel, husband of the decedent, as trustees with directions to pay the income of the trust to the decedent’s daughter, Lucy Ann Allen, during her lifetime with remainder to Otto Hensel and Ruth Kertz.
In 1954 the trustees filed separate accounts current. Euth Kertz filed objections…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Loring v. Town of KingsleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Bowles v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Security-First National Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Bauer v. BauerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Estate of DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Holt v. College of Osteopathic Physicians & SurgeonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- In Re Estate of BreardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Security First National Bank v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Copley v. CopleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Coberly v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.