Legal Opinion

Estate of Davis

California Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1902No. S.F. No. 2656PublishedCited by 50 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

Laura E. Tracy, claiming to be an heir of deceased, Jacob Z. Davis, inaugurated. the present litigation, and is now appealing from an adverse judgment. Her alleged interests have been divided during the pendency of the litigation, and different attorneys represent these different interests. The attorney representing one interest contends that this proceeding is brought in the probate court to set aside the probate of a will, by reason of the wrongs and frauds in the petition alleged; and further claiming that the statute which bars his client from attempting to open up the decree and try the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sohler v. SohlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Toland v. EarlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Mulcahey v. DowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Crall v. Board of Directors of Poso Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. In re the Estate of SbarboroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Security-First National Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Estate of MarreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Estate of DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Estate of McLellanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Tracy v. MuirCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API