Legal Opinion

State v. Flowers

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided July 15, 1998No. 97-3682-CRPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Wisconsin case law has now forcefully and repeatedly determined that either proof of a prior felony conviction or a criminal defendant's admission of the prior conviction is essential if the State seeks additional punishment under § 939.62, Stats., the repeater statute. If a criminal defendant is sentenced as a repeater without either an admission or proof of a prior felony conviction within the statutory time limitation, the repeater portion of the sentence may not be imposed.

In the present case, the trial court sentenced Josh F. Flowers as a habitual criminal to the maximum term of three…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. Escalona-NaranjoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
  3. State v. FarrWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. MeyerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
  5. State v. GoldsteinCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. RichterWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. SaundersWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. KoeppenCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000
  4. State v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
  5. State v. HansonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API