State v. Flowers
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
Wisconsin case law has now forcefully and repeatedly determined that either proof of a prior felony conviction or a criminal defendant's admission of the prior conviction is essential if the State seeks additional punishment under § 939.62, Stats., the repeater statute. If a criminal defendant is sentenced as a repeater without either an admission or proof of a prior felony conviction within the statutory time limitation, the repeater portion of the sentence may not be imposed.
In the present case, the trial court sentenced Josh F. Flowers as a habitual criminal to the maximum term of three…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. Escalona-NaranjoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
- State v. FarrWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. MeyerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
- State v. GoldsteinCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. RichterWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. SaundersWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. KoeppenCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000
- State v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
- State v. HansonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.