Legal Opinion

State v. McAllister

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1982No. 81-693-CRPublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinmetz, J.

This case was certified to this court by the court of appeals; we accepted certification.

The issue is whether prior violations of sec. 346.63(1), Stats., 1 are elements of the crime of driving or operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant or a controlled substance, thereby requiring that the question of their existence be submitted to the jury. The trial court answered “no,” and we affirm.

Unquestionably, the state has the burden of proving each essential element of a crime charged beyond a reasonable doubt. In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358 (1970); Mullaney v. Wilbur, 421…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Spencer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Holland v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. State v. HarveyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. KuntzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. HarrisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. PeeteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. BerkelmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API