Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Cleaners & Dyers, Inc. v. Tondola

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 26, 1932PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAvery, J.

’Error is assigned in the refusal of the court to set aside the verdict returned by the jury in favor of the plaintiff, also in certain rulings upon evidence and in the charge of the court.

From the evidence, the jury might reasonably have found the following facts: On the morning of September 5th, 1928, a Studebaker truck, owned by the plaintiff, was parked on Cherry Street, Waterbury, on the right-hand side of the road, a considerable distance east of the intersection of North Elm Street. Its driver was in one of the adjoining stores, transacting business of the plaintiff. While the driver…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fitch v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1833
  2. Butte Hardware Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
  3. Coe v. KutinskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Baptist v. ShanenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
  2. Bailey v. BobeckiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  3. Whiteman v. Al's Tire & Service Garage, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  4. Sonnichsen v. StreeterConnecticut Appellate Court · 1967
  5. Baptist v. Bankers Indemnity InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API