Legal Opinion

Baptist v. Bankers Indemnity Insurance

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided July 27, 1965No. Civ. No. 7826PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TIMBERS, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff, in the second count of his amended complaint of March 23, 1962, seeks reformation of a garage liability insurance policy and recovery of $35,000 from defendant on the policy as reformed.

Trial of the first count, in which plaintiff sought recovery in the same amount from defendant under the terms of the policy, resulted in a jury verdict in favor of defendant.

After trial of the second count to the Court without a jury, the Court holds that plaintiff is not entitled to reformation of the policy and orders that judgment enter in favor of defendant.

JURISDICTION

Juris…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Patalano v. ChabotSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  2. Libero v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
  3. Home Owners' Loan Corporation v. StevensSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  4. Baptist v. ShanenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
  5. Bailey v. BobeckiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Charles N. Baptist v. Bankers Indemnity Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  2. Charles N. Baptist v. Bankers Indemnity Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API