Coe v. Kutinsky
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Action to recover for tobacco alleged to have been sold to the defendant Case for and on account of the other defendants, brought to the Superior Court in Litchfield County where the plaintiff was nonsuited in a trial to the jury before George W. Wheeler, J., from which judgment he appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.
The plaintiff by this action seeks to recover a judgment against the defendants Kutinsky, Alder & Company, hereinafter called the defendants, for the price of certain tobacco sold by him to the other defendant, Luther M. Case, the plaintiff claiming that these defendants were either partners of Case or his undisclosed principals in the transaction. Case has become bankrupt and made no defense.
The complaint is substantially identical, except as to dates and amounts, with that in the case of Arnold v. Kutirisky et als., the same defendants, reported in 80 Conn. 549,69 Atl. 350. The answer was a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Morgan v. FarrelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
- Fitch v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1833
- Butte Hardware Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
- Robins v. WardeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
- Arnold v. KutinskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
3Cited by6 opinions
- Berkley v. Burlington Cadillac Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1923
- Siller v. PhilipSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Bailey v. BobeckiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Metropolitan Cleaners & Dyers, Inc. v. TondolaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Samstag Hilder Brothers v. OttenheimerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.