Legal Opinion
Baptist v. Shanen
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided October 28, 1958PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, C. J.
The plaintiff brought this action against the named defendant and Harold’s Auto Service, Inc., formerly known as Harold and Shanen’s Auto Service, Inc., and hereinafter referred to as the defendant corporation. The suit was instituted to recover damages for injuries alleged to have been sustained by the plaintiff in Stamford at about 8:30 p.m. on December 26,1952, in consequence of the negligence of the named defendant while he was operating his automobile as the agent of the defendant corporation. There was no allegation that the corporation was the owner of the car. Thus it is unnecessary…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Currie v. Consolidated Railway Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
- Castaldo v. D'ERAMOSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Goldblatt v. FerrignoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Munson v. AtwoodSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Mott v. HillmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Lettieri v. American Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Community Collaborative of Bridgeport, Inc. v. GanimSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Cohen v. Holloways', Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Bader v. United Orthodox SynagogueSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Hollywyle Assn., Inc. v. HollisterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.