Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Bobecki

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 13, 1933PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant Mary Lascinski owned a farm upon which the defendant Bobecki held a second mortgage. The plaintiffs are real-estate brokers and claimed that Bobecki, acting as agent for Mrs. Lascinski, requested them to find a purchaser for the farm, and that they did find a purchaser who was ready, able and willing to buy the farm upon the terms prescribed by the owner. The trial court found that Bobecki was the authorized agent of Mrs. Lascinski, and that through him the plaintiffs were employed to sell the farm and did procure a purchaser for it.

One of the plaintiffs was permitted, over…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Cleaners & Dyers, Inc. v. TondolaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  2. Coe v. KutinskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
  3. Commercial Investment Trust, Inc. v. CarranoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cole v. MyersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
  2. Gesmundo v. BushSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
  3. Baptist v. ShanenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
  4. E. Paul Kovacs & Co. v. BlumgartenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
  5. Bosworth v. BosworthSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API