Legal Opinion

Jones v. Bank of Chapel Hill

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 1, 1939PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClaeicsoN, J.

The defendant at the close of plaintiff’s evidence and at the conclusion of all the evidence, made motions in the court below for judgment as in case of nonsuit. C. S., 567. The motions were overruled and in this we can see no error.

Tbe defendant excepted and assigned error, wbicb cannot be sustained, to all tbe evidence relating to tbe alleged contract of settlement between tbe plaintiff and its cashier, M. E. Hogan, in reference to tbe compromise of tbe four notes totaling $16,700.00. M. E. Hogan was dead at tbe time of tbe trial. Hogan was easbier of tbe bank for twenty years and was tbe…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Belk's Department Store v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  2. Howard-Bobbitt Co. v. Never Fail Land Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  3. Manly v. . BeamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. Grubb v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  5. R. R. v. . Lassiter Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Snyder v. FreemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Carolina Equipment and Parts Company v. AndersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. Investment Properties of Asheville, Inc. v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. GENERAL AIR CONDITIONING COMPANY v. DouglassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. Keith v. GlennSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API