Legal Opinion

GENERAL AIR CONDITIONING COMPANY v. Douglass

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 24, 1954No. 450PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

Plaintiff alleged in its Complaint that “Charles B. Douglass acting for himself and as agent for his wife, Olive J. Douglass, entered into an entire and indivisible contract with plaintiff” to install a warm air-type heating system complete in a house on the lot described in the Complaint. The plaintiff contends such an agency can be implied from the facts in evidence.

All the defendants in their answers denied that Charles B. Douglass acted as agent for his wife. His wife in her answer alleged as a defense that she did not know plaintiff, had no dealings with it, had no knowledge that it…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Davis v. . BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  2. Bruce v. . NicholsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  3. Whichard v. LipeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Whichard v. . LipeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  5. West v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Embree Construction Group, Inc. v. Rafcor, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  2. Lake Mary Ltd. Partnership v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  3. Norburn v. MacKieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  4. Beacon Homes, Inc. v. HoltSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. Nytco Leasing, Inc. v. Southeastern Motels, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API