Legal Opinion

Eastburn v. Regional Fire Protection Authority

California Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 2003No. S107792PublishedCited by 92 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHIN, J.

In California, public agencies each year receive millions of 911 dispatch calls seeking emergency, medical, and fire services. (E.g., Sen. Com. on Energy and Public Utilities and Joint Com. on Fire, Police, Emergency and Disaster Services (Nov. 21, 1990) Joint Interim Hearing on the 911 Emergency Response System—An Overview of Its Effectiveness, pp. 11 [Cal. Highway Patrol], 18 [Los Angeles Police Dept.], 23 [Los Angeles County], 25 [Los Angeles Fire Dept.].) In this case, we must decide whether public entities employing emergency dispatchers are subject to direct or vicarious…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Zelig v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Williams v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Arnett v. Dal CieloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Hoff v. Vacaville Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by92 opinions

  1. Miklosy v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Roy Steinberg v. Sahara Sam's Oasis, Llc(075294)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2016
  3. City of Santa Barbara v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  4. C.A. v. William S. Hart Union High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Munoz v. City of Union CityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API