Roberson Enterprises v. MILLER LAND & LUMBER, INC.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
David Newbern, Justice.
The appellee sought an order partially cancelling three oil and gas leases between it, as lessor, and the appellants, as lessees. The basis of the complaint was breach of alleged implied covenants of reasonable development of the mineral interests on portions of each of the leased lands. The chancellor found the implied covenants to exist and that there had thus far been no breach by the appellants. However, the chancellor ordered the appellants to execute a release on February 5, 1986, from the leases of the lands in question unless they had drilled a producing well or…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Rush v. King Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1976
- Kohn v. PearsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
- Amerada Petroleum Co. v. DoeringCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
- Byrd v. BradhamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
- Nolan v. ThomasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Campbell v. Asbury Automotive, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
- Bob Klein v. Arkoma Production CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Vowell v. Fairfield Bay Community Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Sunbelt Exploration Co. v. Stephens Production Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. v. NL IndustriesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.