Legal Opinion
Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. v. NL Industries
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided August 18, 2009No. Civil Action H-05-4160, H-06-3504PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION
LEE H. ROSENTHAL, District Judge.
This opinion addresses motions for partial summary judgment filed by Georgia-Pacific Corporation (“Georgia-Pacific”) and Milwhite Inc. (“Milwhite”). Georgia-Pacific and Milwhite assert that, as a matter of law, they are not liable to Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. (“HESI”) and DII Industries, LLC (“DU”) (together, “Halliburton”), or to each other, under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), 1 or under the Arkansas Remedial Action Trust Fund Act (RATFA). 2 The parties filed lengthy briefs…
2Cases cited73 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. BestfoodsSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Boudreaux v. Swift Transportation Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- Deville v. MarcantelCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lockheed Martin Corporation v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Yankee Gas Services Co. v. UGI Utilities, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2012
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2015
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2018
- Seattle Times Co. v. Leathercare, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.