Byrd v. Bradham
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Darrell Hickman, Justice.
This is an oil and gas lease case and the question is whether a lease should be cancelled because of a violation of an implied covenant to develop the leasehold interest for production of oil or gas. The chancellor found that the lessors had failed to prove a violation of the implied covenant and refused cancellation of the lease. We disagree and reverse.
The lease in question was executed in 1952 and concerns 80 acres of land in Columbia County, Arkansas. For 28 years the lessees, who are the appellees in this case, failed to take any action to develop 75 acres of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ezzell v. Oil Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
- Standard Oil Co. of Louisiana v. GillerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
- Amoco Production Co. v. WareSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- Mansfield Gas Co. v. ParkhillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
- Nolan v. ThomasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Sunbelt Exploration Co. v. Stephens Production Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- Roberson Enterprises v. MILLER LAND & LUMBER, INC.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
- Davis v. Ross Production Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- Sonat Exploration Co. v. Superior Oil Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1985
- Crystal Oil Co. v. WarmackSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.