Nolan v. Thomas
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Ed. F. McFaddiN, Associate Justice.
In the Trial Court the appellees were plaintiffs and the appellants Avere defendants; and for convenience we will refer to the parties by trial court designation.
The plaintiffs brought this suit to cancel oil and gas leases and assignments, insofar as the same affected 120 acres of a tract of 160 acres. The reason for cancellation was the defendants’ failure to fulfill the implied covenant to develop the premises for oil and gas. At the conclusion of the plaintiffs’ case, the defendants invoked Act No. 470 of 1949 (§ 27-1729 Ark. Stats., as amended), and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Werbe v. HoltSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
- Sauder v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Ezzell v. Oil Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
- Standard Oil Co. of Louisiana v. GillerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
- Winn v. CollinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Byrd v. BradhamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
- Brixey v. Union Oil Company of CaliforniaDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1968
- Roberson Enterprises v. MILLER LAND & LUMBER, INC.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
- Davis v. Ross Production Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- Sonat Exploration Co. v. Superior Oil Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.