Legal Opinion

Laidlaw v. Commercial Insurance Co. of Newark

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 3, 1977No. 46856PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS J. STAHLER, Justice. *

Walter Laidlaw brought this action against the Commercial Insurance Company of Newark, New Jersey, seeking total disability benefits allegedly due under an insurance policy. The district court sitting without a jury awarded plaintiff the disability benefits. Defendant appeals from the denial of its motion for amended findings or, in the alternative, for a new trial and from the judgment. We affirm.

In 1960, plaintiff, an attorney, obtained a “Professional Men’s Disability Policy” with defendant. The policy provided for the payment of specified sums in the event of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cement, Sand & Gravel Co. v. Agricultural InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  2. Weum v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  3. Blazek v. North American Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  4. Schoenfeld v. BukerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  5. Continental Casualty Company v. FreemanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Wall v. Pennsylvania Life Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Nathe Bros., Inc. v. American National Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  3. Mark Hofkin v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
  4. Oglesby v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1995
  5. George Nikaido v. The Centennial Life Insurance Company, Hughes Aircraft Company Income Insurance Plan, and Hughes Aircraft CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API