Legal Opinion

Nathe Bros., Inc. v. American National Fire Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 3, 2000No. C5-98-2328PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAUL H. ANDERSON, Justice.

This matter comes to us on appeal from a district court grant of summary judgment for respondent American National Fire Insurance Company. The Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed, holding that under the terms of the insurance policy and the Minnesota Standard Fire Insurance Policy, appellant Nathe Brothers, Inc.’s failure to provide a sworn proof of loss within 60 days of American National’s request barred it from any recovery under the policy. We conclude that Nathe Brothers’ failure to submit a sworn proof of loss within 60 days does not automatically bar…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Atwater Creamery Co. v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Reliance Insurance v. St. Paul Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  3. Dairyland Insurance v. Implement Dealers InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  4. Farrell v. Nebraska Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  5. Laidlaw v. Commercial Insurance Co. of NewarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Thommes v. Milwaukee Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  2. General Casualty Co. of Wisconsin v. Wozniak Travel, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  3. Leamington Co. v. Nonprofits' Ins. Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  4. General Mills, Inc. v. Kraft Foods Global, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
  5. Depositors Ins. Co. v. DollanskySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API