Legal Opinion

United Mining Co. v. Morton

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 2, 1917PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Livingston Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Miller

Reversing.

This suit by the appellee, Morton, against appellant, grew ont of a partnership transaction between Morton and Edward Langenbach.

Late in 1899, Edward Langenbach and Arthur J. Morton, residents of Canton, Ohio, orally formed an equal partnership for the purpose of taking mineral *367options and leases, and acquiring and developing mineral rights and holdings in Livingston and Crittenden counties, Ky. By the terms of the partnership, Morton agreed to go into the mineral fields of western Kentucky and devote his whole time in prospecting, exploring, and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Aye v. Philadelphia Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  2. Eastern Kentucky Mineral & Timber Co. v. Swann-Day Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  3. Heller v. DaileyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902
  4. Killebrew v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  5. Morrill v. ColehourIllinois Supreme Court · 1876

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Aden v. DaltonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  2. Wakenva Coal Company, Inc. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  3. Rice v. RiceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  4. Hicks v. Oak's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  5. Duncan v. MasonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API