Legal Opinion

Aden v. Dalton

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided July 30, 1937PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Adens and Kearbeys filed separate suits to cancel mining leases. The two leases involved, and the pertinent facts, are practically identical, except as to names and description. The causes were consolidated below and tried as one and a single judgment entered, canceling both leases. From this judgment defendants appealed. Hereinafter, the term defendants has reference to defendants Dalton and Boyden.

The Aden lease covers forty acres in Butler County, Missouri, and was executed October 27, 1920. Plaintiffs. Frank Aden and his wife, Rena, are lessors of this lease and G. Earl Doane and…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Rich v. DonegheySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. Grubb v. McAfeeTexas Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Lowther Oil Co. v. Miller-Sibley Oil Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Watford Oil & Gas Co. v. ShipmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  5. South Penn Oil Co. v. SnodgrassWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1912

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Robert S. Eaton v. CMH Homes, Inc., and Southern Energy Homes, Inc., and Henry Concrete, LLCSupreme Court of Missouri · 2015
  2. Baier v. Darden RestaurantsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Laclede Gas Company, Doing Business as Midwest Missouri Gas Company v. Amoco Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
  4. Kathryn Jimenez, Petitioner/Respondent v. Cintas CorporationMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Rau Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API