Legal Opinion

Hicks v. Oak's Administrator

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided February 11, 1930PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Willis

Affirming on appeal and reversing on cross-appeal.

This ease is unique in some of its particulars and unusual in all of its features. James Oak, a widower 65 years old, with five grown children, all married, entered into a prenuptial contract with Amanda Ford, a childless widow of about the same age, whereby they agreed that, in the event of a marriage between them, each should retain the property then owned, unaffected bv the marita] relation. The contract contained this provision:

“If said parties should marry, as now intended, it is hereby agreed and…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Wesley v. WesleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  2. Maverick Oil & Gas Co. v. HowellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  3. Hunt v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
  4. Murray v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  5. Brashears v. CombsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Garcia v. KaramTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Truitt v. Truitt's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
  3. City of Princeton v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  4. Business Men's Assur. Co. of America v. EadesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
  5. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. DowneyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API