Legal Opinion

Heller v. Dailey

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 2, 1902No. 3,537PublishedCited by 40 opinions

From the Wells Circuit Court; J. W. Headington, Special Judge. Suit by Lemuel Heller against Michael Dailey and others to enforce the covenants of an oil and gas lease. From a decree for defendants, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

The appellant, Lemuel Heller, in March, 1899, sued the appellees, Michael Dailey, Frank Eddington, Orlando H. Britton and Frederick E. Britton. There was another defendant, Frank L. Waring, whose death was suggested pending the proceedings in the court below, without substitution of a representative. The action was upon a written contract, dated April 22, 1896, signed and acknowledged by the appellant and the appellees Dailey and Eddington, by the terms of which the appellant, of the first part, granted to the appellees Dailey and Eddington, of the second part, “all the oil-and gas in and…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Grommes v. St. Paul Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Plummer v. Hillside Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  3. Edmonds v. MounseyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. Railsback v. WalkeIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Fennell v. GuffeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Texas Company v. W.H. DaughertyTexas Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Rich v. DonegheySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Kolachny v. GalbreathSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. Rives v. Gulf Refining Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
  5. Barker v. Campbell-Ratcliff Land Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API