Legal Opinion

Kammerer v. Western Gear Corp.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1981No. 47594-6PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDolliver, J.

Defendant Western Gear, a Washington corporation, manufactures offshore oil drilling rigs. In May 1972, after negotiations in California, Western Gear entered into a licensing agreement with plaintiffs Archer W. Kammerer, Sr., Archer W. Kammerer, Jr., and Jean K. Lamphere to manufacture certain oil drilling equipment called heave compensators covered by five Kammerer patents. Plaintiffs are all residents of California.

Heave compensators are used in offshore drilling to counteract the effect of wave action. Western Gear made an initial payment and was to pay a $10,000 royalty for each heave…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Lear, Inc. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Barr v. Interbay Citizens Bank of TampaWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Maki v. Aluminum Building ProductsWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Mary S. Kraly, and Cross-Appellee v. National Distillers and Chemical Corporation, and Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. G.S. Enterprises, Inc. v. Falmouth Marine, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  3. Pappas v. HollowayWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Hangartner v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Hangartner v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2004

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API