Legal Opinion

Hangartner v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 2004No. 73930-7PublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

90 P.3d 26 (2004)

151 Wash.2d 439

Rick HANGARTNER Respondent,

v.

CITY OF SEATTLE, a municipal corporation, Appellant.

Citizens Against the Monorail, a political action committee registered with the Washington State Public Disclosure Commission, Respondent,

v.

Seattle Popular Monorail Authority (the "Seattle Monorail Project"), and Harold Robertson, Appellants.

No. 73930-7.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued October 21, 2003.

Decided May 13, 2004.

Reconsideration Denied July 30, 2004.

Thomas Carr, Seattle City Atty., Roger Wynne, Edwin Inkley, Shelley Pellegrino, Seattle, Asst. City Attys., for…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. J.P.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Progressive Animal Welfare Society v. University of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  5. In Re RosierWashington Supreme Court · 1986

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. Spokane Research & Defense Fund v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. SPOKANE RESEARCH FUND v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Soter v. Cowles Publishing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Soter v. Cowles Pub. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Sanders v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2010

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API