Legal Opinion

Maki v. Aluminum Building Products

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1968No. 38183PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

May 16, 1963, pursuant to Rule of Pleading, Practice and Procedure 20 (a), 1 five plaintiffs, William G. Maki, Leonard Radke, Andrew Torgerson, Harrel F. Rice, and Norman Kiehn, and their respective wives, commenced this action against Aluminum Building Products, a general partnership (the membership of the partnership is not disclosed) , and the partnership’s alleged successor, Aluminum Building Products Company, a corporation.

The five statements of claim, not separately stated, arise from five unrelated transactions alleged to have occurred on different dates 2 during a period of almost 3…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Spokane Truck & Dray Co. v. HoeferWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Meissner v. Simpson Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Coson v. RoehlWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Slippern v. BriggsWashington Supreme Court · 1964

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Morris v. McNicolWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Lamon v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Barr v. Interbay Citizens Bank of TampaWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Cox v. StolworthyIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Town of Jackson v. ShawWyoming Supreme Court · 1977

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API