Legal Opinion

Hangartner v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 2004No. 73930-7PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, C.J.

These consolidated cases raise several issues including: (1) whether a request made under the public disclosure act (PDA) for all of an agency’s documents is overbroad, thus excusing the agency from complying with the disclosure request; (2) whether the mere existence of public debate surrounding a transportation project is a “controversy,” as defined in RCW 42.17.310(l)(j), rendering *443documents related to the project exempt from the PDA; and (3) whether documents covered by the attorney-client privilege are exempt from the PDA. We conclude that documents covered by the attorney-client…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. J.P.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Dawson v. DalyWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. ChesterWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Amren v. City of KalamaWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Amren v. City of KalamaWashington Supreme Court · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. Spokane Research & Defense Fund v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. SPOKANE RESEARCH FUND v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Soter v. Cowles Publishing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Soter v. Cowles Pub. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Sanders v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2010

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API