Legal Opinion

State v. Redd

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 2001No. 20000556PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWE, Chief Justice.

INTRODUCTION

11 The State refiled an information against defendants for violating section 76-9-704(1)(b) of the Utah Code (1995), and filed for the first time charges under section 76-9-704(1)(a), arising from defendants' alleged removal or desecration of ancient human bones at an archeological site. Dismissing both charges, the magistrate held that State v. Brickey, 714 P.2d 644 (Utah 1986), combined with the magistrate's interpretation of a Utah Court of Appeals case, State v. Morgan, 2000 UT App. 48, 997 P.2d 910, barred refiling of the previously dismissed charge.

BACKGRO…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. BrickeyUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. ReddUtah Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. MorganUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. ReddCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1998
  5. State v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2000

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Speros v. FrickeUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. DANIEL BAGLEY ROGERSUtah Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. AtencioCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2004
  4. Regal Insurance Co. v. Canal Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. Pacheco-OrtegaCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API