Legal Opinion

Regal Insurance Co. v. Canal Insurance Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 2004No. 20020198PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Certiorari to the Utah Court of Appeals

PARRISH, Justice:

¶1 In this case, we address the statutory procedure applicable to Utah insurers seeking reimbursement of no-fault or personal injury protection (“PIP”) benefits from other insurers. An insurer paid a PIP benefit claim to its insured and then, by filing suit, sought reimbursement for that payment from the tortfeasor’s insurer. We are called upon to decide whether binding arbitration is the exclusive forum for an insurer seeking such reimbursement. We hold that it is.

BACKGROUND

¶2 While waiting at the curb with her bicycle, Christina…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance Co. v. IvieUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. OstlerUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Docutel Olivetti Corp. v. Dick Brady Systems Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Laub v. SOUTH CENTRAL UTAH TELEPHONE ASS'NUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Giannopulos v. PappasUtah Supreme Court · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Speros v. FrickeUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Ellsworth Paulsen Construction Co. v. 51-SPR-L.L.C.Utah Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Estate of Berkemeir ex rel. Nielsen v. Hartford Insurance Co. of the MidwestUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Matthews v. Olympus Construction, L.C.Utah Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API