Legal Opinion

State v. Brickey

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1986No. 20107PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZIMMERMAN, Justice:

Defendant Keith Brickey appeals from an interlocutory order of the Fourth District Court refusing to quash the circuit court’s order binding him over for trial on a charge of forcible sexual assault. Brickey asserts that his due process rights were violated when the State was allowed to refile a criminal charge identical to one that had been dismissed for insufficient evidence at an earlier preliminary hearing. We agree that the due process clause of the Utah Constitution prohibits such a refiling of criminal charges absent a showing of new or additional evidence or other…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Coleman v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. United States v. Joseph A. Chase, United States of America v. Robert H. Parrish, United States of America v. Wyatt J. Roy, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
  3. Richmond v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1971

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. State v. BishopUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Walker v. SchneiderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. ReddUtah Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Rathbun v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
  5. State v. VincentUtah Supreme Court · 1994

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API