State v. Brickey
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ZIMMERMAN, Justice:
Defendant Keith Brickey appeals from an interlocutory order of the Fourth District Court refusing to quash the circuit court’s order binding him over for trial on a charge of forcible sexual assault. Brickey asserts that his due process rights were violated when the State was allowed to refile a criminal charge identical to one that had been dismissed for insufficient evidence at an earlier preliminary hearing. We agree that the due process clause of the Utah Constitution prohibits such a refiling of criminal charges absent a showing of new or additional evidence or other…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Coleman v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Joseph A. Chase, United States of America v. Robert H. Parrish, United States of America v. Wyatt J. Roy, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
- Richmond v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1980
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1971
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- State v. BishopUtah Supreme Court · 1988
- Walker v. SchneiderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. ReddUtah Supreme Court · 1999
- Rathbun v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. VincentUtah Supreme Court · 1994
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.