State v. DANIEL BAGLEY ROGERS
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WILKINS, Associate Chief Justice:
INTRODUCTION
¶ 1 Defendant Rogers appealed his conviction of theft by receiving stolen property. The court of appeals reversed in a 2-1 decision, concluding that the magistrate improperly continued the preliminary hearing in violation of State v. Brickey, which bars the refiling of charges dismissed at a preliminary hearing for insufficient evidence absent the State’s showing of “new or previously unavailable evidence” or other good cause. 714 P.2d 644, 647-48 (Utah 1986). Brickey has previously been applied only to cases of dismissal. We granted certiorari to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1971
- State v. BrickeyUtah Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. WilliamsUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- Harper v. District Court of Oklahoma CountyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1971
- State v. MorganUtah Supreme Court · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Carter v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. GunterCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
- Friends of Maple Mountain, Inc. v. Mapleton CityUtah Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. Pacheco-OrtegaCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2011
- Torres v. MadsenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.