Legal Opinion

State v. DANIEL BAGLEY ROGERS

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 2006No. 20051024PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILKINS, Associate Chief Justice:

INTRODUCTION

¶ 1 Defendant Rogers appealed his conviction of theft by receiving stolen property. The court of appeals reversed in a 2-1 decision, concluding that the magistrate improperly continued the preliminary hearing in violation of State v. Brickey, which bars the refiling of charges dismissed at a preliminary hearing for insufficient evidence absent the State’s showing of “new or previously unavailable evidence” or other good cause. 714 P.2d 644, 647-48 (Utah 1986). Brickey has previously been applied only to cases of dismissal. We granted certiorari to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1971
  2. State v. BrickeyUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. WilliamsUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Harper v. District Court of Oklahoma CountyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1971
  5. State v. MorganUtah Supreme Court · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Carter v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. GunterCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
  3. Friends of Maple Mountain, Inc. v. Mapleton CityUtah Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. Pacheco-OrtegaCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2011
  5. Torres v. MadsenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API