Legal Opinion

Muri v. Young

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1926No. 5,823PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stark

It appears from the record that plaintiff is the receiver of the Bank of Commerce, a banking corporation organized under the laws of this state, with its principal place of business at Forsyth, which is insolvent. Before the commencement of this suit proceedings had been duly taken for the levy of an assessment of 100 per cent upon the stock held by stockholders in the bank, under the authority of section 6036, Revised Codes of 1921, as amended by Chapter 9 of the Session Laws of 1923, which provides: “The stockholders of every bank shall he severally and individually liable, equally and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. McClaine v. RankinSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Goodwin v. GilbertMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1813
  3. Barth v. PockMontana Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Ancient Order of Hibernians v. SparrowMontana Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Assets Realization Co. v. . HowardNew York Court of Appeals · 1914

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mary G. Roebling v. Robert B. Anderson, Secretary of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
  2. Mitchell v. Banking Corporation of Mont.Montana Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Fraser v. ClarkMontana Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Brown v. RobertsMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Fredericks v. HammonsArizona Supreme Court · 1928

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API