Legal Opinion

Goodwin v. Gilbert

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 15, 1813PublishedCited by 51 opinions

This was an action of assumpsit, in which the plaintiffs set forth ■ an indenture of a lease for six years, made on the 18th of January, 1809, by one Andrew Dexter, Jun., to William, Hamilton, of a certain messuage in Boston, called the Exchange Coffee-House, and sundry articles of furniture, and other personal property ;—another indenture between the same parties, made on the 5th of May following, making some alterations in the rent reserved, and the mode of payment; — an…

Read the full summary

This was an action of assumpsit, in which the plaintiffs set forth ■ an indenture of a lease for six years, made on the 18th of January, 1809, by one Andrew Dexter, Jun., to William, Hamilton, of a certain messuage in Boston, called the Exchange Coffee-House, and sundry articles of furniture, and other personal property ;—another indenture between the same parties, made on the 5th of May following, making some alterations in the rent reserved, and the mode of payment; — an indenture made on the 6th of the same May, between the said Dexter and one George Odiorne, by which the said Dexter…

1Opinion of the Court

* By the Court.

The principal question in this case is, whether, if one grant lands to another by deed poll, with a reservation of certain duties to be performed by the grantee for the benefit of the grantor, this latter may have assumpsit against the grantee upon his non-performance? It has long been settled that an action lies for rent reserved upon a deed poll. The reason of the principle has a general application; and we are all satisfied that, as a general rule, where land is conveyed by deed poll, and the grantee enters under the deed, certain duties being reserved to be performed, as no…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hills v. EliotMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1815
  2. Jackson v. MorseNew York Supreme Court · 1819
  3. Jackson ex dem. Benson v. MatsdorfNew York Supreme Court · 1814
  4. Boyd v. StoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1814
  5. Jackson ex dem. Whitlocke v. MillsNew York Supreme Court · 1816

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. M'Crea v. PurmortCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1836
  2. Locke v. HomerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
  3. Furnas v. DurginMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  4. Midland Railway Co. v. FisherIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Sanger v. WarrenTexas Supreme Court · 1898

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API