Legal Opinion

Fredericks v. Hammons

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1928No. Civil No. 2679PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, C. J.

— This is an action to enforce a stockholder’s double liability. The Prescott State Bank, an insolvent, on November 25th, 1925, was taken pos session of by A. T. Hammons, state superintendent of banks. ' It was incorporated in 1916 with a capital stock of $100,000, divided into 1,000 shares of the par value of $100 each, all issued and outstanding. The defendant, B. N. Fredericks, at the time the bank superintendent took over the bank for liquidation, was the owner of 289 shares of such stock. In the insolvency proceeding, upon the petition of the superintendent of banks, on January 13th,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hathaway v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Ancient Order of Hibernians v. SparrowMontana Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Kennedy v. California Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Whittier v. VisscherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Aronson & Co. v. PearsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gaiser v. BuckIndiana Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Pioneer Annuity Life Insurance v. RichCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  3. Washington Loan & Trust Co. v. AllmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1934
  4. Harper v. MoranCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1935
  5. Herndon v. HammonsArizona Supreme Court · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API