Legal Opinion

Gist v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1988No. 87-263PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARDINE, Chief Justice.

Appellant Steve Gist was convicted of delivery of a controlled substance, marijuana, in violation of § 35-7-1031(a)(ii), W.S. 1977. He appeals his conviction, contending that the trial court erred in prohibiting him from presenting witnesses to impeach a narcotics officer who testified against him.

We reverse.

On May 17,1985, David Lauck, an undercover narcotics officer for the Campbell County Sheriff’s Department, met appellant’s brother, Roger Gist, in the alley beside the Gist brothers’ house. The two men entered a vehicle, and Roger Gist asked Agent Lauck if he wanted…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Irizarry v. President of Harvard CollegeSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Gist v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  4. MacLaird v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Valerio v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Engberg v. MeyerWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Dickeson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  3. King v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Calene v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Proffit v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2008

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API